The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Superhero almost saves the day, again, in well-made, redundant sequel

share this article

Behind the mask: Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) plots his next move

Spider-senses will be buzzing alarmingly before the end, as deadly danger approaches Peter Parker and his loved ones - just the sort of danger, in fact, that some viewers may remember from the distant days of 2004, and Spider-Man 2, Sam Raimi’s superhero movie high-water mark. It’s the problem that won’t go away for the series reboot Sony’s budget and creative conflicts with Raimi required, when the series had only just begun. Everyone has done an excellent job on director Marc Webb’s exciting, well-crafted sequel to his first Spider-Man film. But it’s impossible to reboot audiences’ brains, and forget the same job was done even better, only the other day.

Webb’s style is at least distinct, right from the opening, desperate action flashback, in which Parker’s late dad Richard (Campbell Scott) grapples for control of a computer in a skyjacked plane. Everything that happens feels cleanly muscular and slightly hyper-real, digital and 3D effects in a harmony unavailable to Raimi. Webb also dips into different elements of early Spider-Man comics than those Raimi chose - focusing on the fairly obscure revelation of Peter’s dad’s secret agent past, and the death of Gwen Stacy’s dad in the first film, a reminder that getting close to Parker can be fatal.

Webb then lets his long film unfold at a leisurely pace, observing the romance between Parker (Andrew Garfield) and Gwen (Emma Stone, pictured, above right). Just as the comic-book Spider-Man’s particular strength was always the tragic soap opera of Parker’s life, so Webb relishes his actors’ chemistry. Kirsten Dunst breathed perky life into Mary Jane Watson for Raimi, but Stone is an uniquely convincing, strong female character for a superhero film. Her relationship with Garfield’s Parker as they spar, break up, flirt and get back together feels real, and between equals. Essentially, the strange, surreal world of original Spider-Man artist Steve Ditko, so suited to Raimi, has been replaced by the one enjoyed by his late Sixties successor, former romance comic artist John Romita. The sense of Peter Parker as a genuine oddball and underdog is gone, too, though, along with Tobey Maguire. Garfield is good, but he and Stone are beautiful, regular young people: born winners.

When the super-villain sub-plots finally kick in, the time spent on our heroes ramps up their jeopardy. Jamie Foxx, first seen as a geek with missing teeth and a Jack Charlton comb-over, transforms into Electro, a minor villain in the comics here intelligently rethought for the digital age, as his ability to absorb electricity shuts Manhattan down, leaving planes hurtling blindly towards each other. Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan, pictured above right, with Garfield) is a slyer presence, a troubled old friend of Peter, genetically cursed by his late father as Peter was gifted heroic attributes by his. DeHaan, an actor rapidly on the rise, catches Osborn’s Ivy League indolence, and the incipient malevolence which will burst forth when he inevitably becomes the Green Goblin.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 feels convincing and finally moving while it’s on. One of several things it misplaces is the New York Jewish hipster wit the comics’ writer Stan Lee injected into every panel. Lee, now 91, gets his usual cameo, and the satisfaction that his co-creation is still commercially thriving. But Spider-Man’s freshness, back on Lee or Raimi’s watch, is wilting.

Overleaf: watch the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man 2

The sense of Peter Parker as a genuine oddball and underdog is gone, along with Tobey Maguire

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more film

Dip your toes into these Homeric movies before Christopher Nolan’s 'The Odyssey' ties us to its mast
A Bellocchio classic is retooled as a stifllng rich-brats' revenge story
A potential camera in every hand: SMart celebrates smartphone directors
Hitchcockian black comedy from Luis Buñuel’s Mexican period
Olivia Wilde's snappy comedy on the perennial subject of reviving a failing marriage
Kiss kiss, bang bang in a moving Middle East documentary
David Vann's acclaimed novella transposed to the screen with mixed results
The most important 'how-to video' you are ever likely to see
Satyajit Ray's poignant, thoughtful drama, set in 1960s Calcutta
Superman's party girl cousin earns her stripes underwhelmingly
Convoluted drama takes on Fab Four delusions, brotherly trauma and ultraviolence
Sophy Romvari's atmospheric first feature looks back at a tortured family dynamic