Best of Enemies

Gore Vidal and William F Buckley, Jr change the terms of TV debate in 1968

share this article

William F Buckley, Jr and Gore Vidal spar in the studio

It wasn’t quite Ali vs Frazier. But the 1968 debates between William F Buckley, Jr and Gore Vidal were as bruising (nearly literally) as TV had seen, and haunted the protagonists for the rest of their lives. Morgan Neville and Robert Gordan’s documentary claims its aftershocks also damaged TV and America in ways we’re still suffering through.

In 1968, Vidal’s ribald, transsexual comic novel Myra Breckinridge, waspish essays puncturing the follies of what he termed the American Empire, and a conviction that “there are two things you don’t turn down: sex and TV,” made him a notorious liberal. Buckley edited the influential hard-right magazine New Republic, and was a strikingly mannered, forthright TV debate favourite. Both men were patrician intellectuals in their middle-aged prime, respectively familiar with Democrat and Republican inner circles (Jackie Kennedy was Vidal’s half-stepsister). Each thought the other loathsome and dangerous. Just like the Ali-Frazier bouts, this was personal.

ABC TV brought them together as a cost-cutting measure. The very poor relation of NBC and CBS couldn’t afford their blanket coverage of 1968’s political conventions, instead using Vidal and Buckley to comment on each day’s events. US TV news then is described as “a big, bland centre,” the likes of Walter Cronkite providing a homely consensus watched by most Americans each evening. Vietnam was shaking that. The Republican convention in Miami and, especially, the Democrats’ in Chicago became flashpoints revealing a nation being ripped apart by the war. Buckley and Vidal stepped into this febrile environment wanting to destroy each other.

Vidal, knowing Buckley never bothered to research, came to Miami armed with damning quotes. Buckley retaliated in Chicago by passing Vidal a hand-written letter from the just-assassinated Bobby Kennedy, declaring Vidal worse than the Viet Cong. Best of Enemies’ pacey editing focuses on the key exchanges. The body language is electrically charged, each man trying to maintain their superior veneer, Buckley’s twitching, lupine grins met by Vidal’s pitying amusement, as their elaborate command of language finds fine points to pierce the others’ hide.

Finally, the infamous Chicago police riot, pictured left, during which protestors, delegates and journalists were clubbed, removed all finesse. Footage shows a nervous Arthur Miller and Paul Newman in the hours leading up to it, followed by stills of Vidal watching with appalled attentiveness, after all three men have passed through tear-gas clouds. In the debate that follows, Buckley defends the police; Vidal calls him a “crypto-fascist”. Buckley, fists bunching, leaning almost out of his chair, calls his enemy a “queer,” and threatens to beat him up.

Vidal declared back then that a “cultural war” was being fought in America. That final exchange, with Buckley’s repulsion at his sexuality laid bare, helped describe the terms of engagement. Buckley regretted losing control for the rest of his life. Vidal rewatched videos of the debate obsessively, and referred to them daily. Both men came to feel they’d lost.

It’s easy to feel nostalgic about a time when American chat shows starred Vidal, Norman Mailer and Truman Capote, watched by mass audiences as they bickered and sparred. Best of Enemies spools forward to the ’68 debates’ offspring: Fox News’s intellectually barren blood-sports. As this sharp, exciting film contends, many unpredictable genies smashed free of their bottles in 1968.

Overleaf: watch the trailer for Best of Enemies

The body language is electrically charged, Buckley’s twitching, lupine grins met by Vidal’s pitying amusement

rating

4

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more film

Dip your toes into these Homeric movies before Christopher Nolan’s 'The Odyssey' ties us to its mast
A Bellocchio classic is retooled as a stifllng rich-brats' revenge story
A potential camera in every hand: SMart celebrates smartphone directors
Hitchcockian black comedy from Luis Buñuel’s Mexican period
Olivia Wilde's snappy comedy on the perennial subject of reviving a failing marriage
Kiss kiss, bang bang in a moving Middle East documentary
David Vann's acclaimed novella transposed to the screen with mixed results
The most important 'how-to video' you are ever likely to see
Satyajit Ray's poignant, thoughtful drama, set in 1960s Calcutta
Superman's party girl cousin earns her stripes underwhelmingly
Convoluted drama takes on Fab Four delusions, brotherly trauma and ultraviolence
Sophy Romvari's atmospheric first feature looks back at a tortured family dynamic