Involuntary

Swedish debut delivers style and substance but risks alienating its audience

share this article

Linnea Cart-Lamy and Sara Eriksson pose for Östlund's voyeuristic camera

This first feature from Swedish writer-director Ruben Östlund arrives heavy with awards, the seasoned and decorated product of film festivals across Europe. Brutal, quirky and elegantly self-conscious, it does little to challenge the trends that have recently made Swedish cinema (Let The Right One In, The Millennium Trilogy) such hot property. The title serves as agent provocateur for the action that follows: a fractured and wilful deconstruction of group dynamics, of the pressures and “victims” of the social collective.

Two barely teenage girls (Linnea Cart-Lamy, Sara Eriksson) pose and pout in front of a camera, writhing and preening for an imaginary audience; a group of thirtysomething men holiday at a remote chalet, their horseplay and joking suddenly taking a turn for the serious; an elderly man (Villmar Bjorkman) is badly injured at his birthday party, but determines not to let it show. The film takes five separate encounters, juxtaposing and interweaving them in familiar-enough fashion.

Yet, confounding the Hollywood expectation that disparate narratives will come together in some great reveal that renders their trivialities weighty and suddenly meaningful, Östlund keeps his episodes isolated, insignificant and wilfully unconnected. The effect is of a series of short films, cross-cut and edited roughly together.

Inspired by a computer game, it is Östlund’s unconventional camera shots that give the film its distinctive colour. Rather than a sentient, framing device, his camera instead becomes a blunt instrument, recording but never reacting to the action. In a style that owes much to Michael Haneke, we catch sight of events only at a remove – in the reflection of a car door, through a window, from a distance – occasionally not even catching their accompanying dialogue. The cast of unknowns and amateurs remain faceless or headless for much of their screen time, with critical encounters witnessed only from below the knees, or over someone’s shoulder.

This alienation is countered by Östlund’s fondness for long takes, with each scene rehearsed minutely then recorded as a single, organic sequence of action. The effect is unnerving, with all the bald directness of documentary, unsoftened by editorialising. A scene in which a young teacher witnesses a colleague strike a student is neither drawn out nor actively climactic, and it is precisely this absence of emotion or reactive energy that makes it so arresting. It’s a technique that does risk becoming wilfully obstructive however, so resolute is Östlund’s commitment to anti-drama.

The one exception among Östlund’s cast of new faces (all of whom tellingly share their names with their on-screen characters) is celebrated Swedish actress Maria Lundqvist. She delivers an impressively un-starry performance as a famous actress on a coach trip in an episode that delivers perhaps the most emphatic working-out of the director’s theme, culminating in a false confession being drawn from a young child.

Östlund’s film does exactly what it sets out to do. Whether it is worth doing is less certain. A systematic study of the relationships between individuals and their community, issues of personal will and moral pressure are minutely exposed but hardly developed by the wilfully hands-off approach. Involuntary delivers all the infuriatingly micro-controlled manipulations and alienation of Haneke but with little of his aesthetic payoff. Involuntary is unquestionably an accomplished film, but its enjoyments are at times unnecessarily hard won.

We catch sight of events in the reflection of a car door, through a window, from a distance. The cast of unknowns and amateurs remain faceless or headless...

rating

0

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more film

Dip your toes into these Homeric movies before Christopher Nolan’s 'The Odyssey' ties us to its mast
A Bellocchio classic is retooled as a stifllng rich-brats' revenge story
A potential camera in every hand: SMart celebrates smartphone directors
Hitchcockian black comedy from Luis Buñuel’s Mexican period
Olivia Wilde's snappy comedy on the perennial subject of reviving a failing marriage
Kiss kiss, bang bang in a moving Middle East documentary
David Vann's acclaimed novella transposed to the screen with mixed results
The most important 'how-to video' you are ever likely to see
Satyajit Ray's poignant, thoughtful drama, set in 1960s Calcutta
Superman's party girl cousin earns her stripes underwhelmingly
Convoluted drama takes on Fab Four delusions, brotherly trauma and ultraviolence
Sophy Romvari's atmospheric first feature looks back at a tortured family dynamic