The Last of the De Mullins, Jermyn Street Theatre

Rediscovered Edwardian play offers surprisingly robust feminist discourse

share this article

Rebel rebel: Janet (Charlotte Powell) rejects Bertha's (Alexandra Dowling) conventional path
Tristram Kenton

Even the most begrudging acquaintance with thematic foghorn Downton Abbey will have affirmed that the Edwardian era heralded momentous social change. Provocatively embedding this revolution in his work was largely forgotten “New Drama” exponent St John Hankin, whose suicide Shaw described as “a public calamity”; Granville-Barker dedicated his first volume of plays to him.

The Orange Tree rescued Hankin from obscurity with multiple revivals, and now Jermyn Street attempts to demonstrate why this unfamiliar name was once held in such reverence. Debuting director Joshua Stamp-Simon has selected a persuasive piece: 1908 feminist satire The Last of the De Mullins, performed privately in order to escape the censor.

No wonder – this is incendiary material. Prodigal daughter Janet (Charlotte Powell), who fled home pregnant and unmarried and became a successful London shopkeeper, returns to Dorset with her illegitimate son (Jenk Oz and Rufus King-Dabbs) when her father (Stuart Organ) falls ill. De Mullin, desperate to perpetuate the family name, will forgive her indiscretions in return for raising his heir, but proud single mother Janet, who refuses to marry simply to satisfy convention, defends her alternative lifestyle: the inert aristocracy is irrelevant, while she is of “some use” to the world. Hankin, shockingly, endorses her radical opinion.

The Last of the De Mullins, Jermyn Street TheatreBut this 90-minute play suffers from tonal schizophrenia, beginning as Wildean drawing-room comedy and ending as impassioned didactic drama, evoking Shaw, Galsworthy and Ibsen in its upending of stifling moral codes and insular snobbery. Hankin’s somewhat laboured execution cannot boast the depth and rigorous intellect of more polished contemporaries – expository exchanges drag, and familiar New Drama figures (authoritarian father, rebellious child, conventional sibling, interfering dowager) are not particularly refreshed by his treatment.

Yet his boldly expressed ideas are still pertinent 100 years on – Noughties TV series Gilmore Girls used essentially the same premise to likewise address changing female roles, generational conflict and the challenges of self-determinism. Hankin’s Janet, vigorously embodied by Powell, is a thoroughly modern heroine: self-sufficient, proactive and refreshingly candid. She’s no saint, however. There’s canny cynicism in her deceit and commercialism, and, like a razor-tongued version of Lizzy Bennet, her forthright observations lacerate.

One victim is pious sister Hester (Maya Wasowicz), whose virtue has yet to reap rewards. Wasowicz excels when the mask slips to reveal her thwarted passions. Organ’s De Mullin is an ardent mouthpiece for the patriarchy, believing the only female “independence” is dependence on a husband, while Roberta Taylor (pictured above with Harriet Thorpe) is touching as his conflicted wife and Thorpe enjoyable as imperious Aunt Harriet, one disapproving eyebrow a waggle away from full-on Lady Bracknell. There’s good support from Benjamin Fisher’s nice-but-dim ex, Alexandra Dowling’s perky fiancée and Matilda Thorpe’s gossipy neighbour.

Stamp-Simon’s straightforward staging and Victoria Johnstone’s "faded grandeur" set are on the tentative side, but in its best moments, The Last of the De Mullins is a compelling part of our theatrical heritage.

Hankin's boldly expressed ideas are still pertinent 100 years on, addressing changing female roles, generational conflict and self-determinism

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist