Breakfast at Tiffany’s, Theatre Royal Haymarket

Bland taste to this breakfast starring Pixie Lott as Holly Golightly

share this article

Trying on the role of actor: Pixie Lott as Holly Golightly in 'Breakfast at Tiffany's'
Sean Ebsworth Barnes

Think of Holly Golightly, and it’s more than likely that the face you’re picturing is Audrey Hepburn’s. And, while this adaptation by Richard Greenberg of Breakfast at Tiffany's is much closer to Truman Capote’s novella, it doesn’t have an ounce of the appeal of Blake Edwards’ famous film. Directed by antiseptic efficiency in a Leicester Curve production by Nikolai Foster, it’s numbingly dull  – a dreary, inert tale of brittle, dislikeable people, inhabiting a tastefully designed bubble that is rarely pricked by events from the outside world.

The war gets an occasional mention, but no one seems terribly interested. All the piece has to sustain it is its portrait of a lopsided, distorted relationship between a sexually confused writer and Holly, described by her creator as an “American geisha” – here portrayed by popstrel Pixie Lott, whose name is surely the sole reason for this staging’s presence in the West End.

Lott doesn’t have to worry too much about comparisons to Hepburn’s iconic look in the movie, given that the play, like the book, is set in New York in the 1940s, not the 1960s. And she’s far from terrible in the role of this elusive enigma, a character whose livelihood – and, in a sense, whose very existence – depends on her ability to be pleasing to whichever pair of eyes happens to be roving over her. Lott, slender, lithe and blonde, is dazzlingly pretty, and moves with confidence. But she’s a singer, trying on the role of actor. She speaks her lines  with practised precision, and with repetitive rhythms and cadences – you can hear, and feel, the by-rote memorising behind every beat of her delivery. And in trying to convey Holly’s allure, she pushes her flirtatiousness and sensuality too hard. Only the biggest fool would allow himself to fall for her wiles.

The production gets its money’s worth out of her by having her sing three times – not just "Moon River", but "People Will Say We’re in Love" as well as a new number, "Dying Day", by Grant Olding, all of them accompanied by her strumming on the guitar. She’s clearly far more comfortable here, and these interludes are pleasant enough. But they’re also opportunistic and wildly incongruous, given that Lott’s melismatic warbling and misty-eyed, middle-distance gaze would be better suited to The X Factor.

The rest of the time, to a jazzy, Brubeck-esque soundtrack, Matthew Wright’s sets glide balletically around, illuminated rain decoratively falls, and Matt Barber’s narrator Fred (pictured above with Pixie Lott) falls into a passionate, eroticised friendship with Lott’s Holly that is complicated by the fact that, as she herself acidly indicates, he would rather be sating his desires with one of the sailors hanging around the Brooklyn Bridge. Barber’s performance is decent enough, but it’s impossible to care what becomes of him, or of Holly. Happily, there is some warmth elsewhere, notably in the kindly barkeep Joe Bell (Victor McGuire); and if anyone comes close to engaging our sympathies, it’s Robert Calvert as Doc Golightly, Holly’s estranged and abandoned hillbilly husband, who stands outside her apartment door, rumpled and nervous in his overalls, smooths his white hair and tremulously asks Fred, “Do I look nice?”

Cat lovers may also enjoy the appearance of a lavishly fluffy white moggy – but being upstaged by a feline is probably nothing to purr about. Still, this isn’t a howler. It’s just difficult to see any point in it.

You can hear, and feel, the by-rote memorising behind every beat of Pixie Lott's delivery

rating

2

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist