Fences

Acclaimed stage play makes awkward transition to film

share this article

Is that Oscar calling? Troy Maxson (Denzel Washington) and his wife Rose (Viola Davis)

Fences is one of the best-known works by playwright August Wilson, part of his Century Cycle of plays exploring 100 years of black American history, and it won him a Pulitzer Prize and a Tony Award in 1987. Wilson died in 2005, but further gongs greeted the play’s 2010 Broadway revival, including Tonys for its stars Denzel Washington and Viola Davis. Alongside the bulk of the 2010 cast, they reprise their roles of Troy and Rose Maxson in this film version, and both are Oscar-nominated. Washington also directed.

The story is set in 1950s Pittsburgh, where an ageing Troy is eking out a living as a garbageman and trying to maintain an outward facade of proud patriarchal manliness. As the story progresses we come to understand that Troy’s chest-out bravado masks all kinds of bitter disappointments. He coulda been a contender as a pro baseball player, but he claims his potential was sawn off by racism (it takes Rose to point out that he was too old, since he spent 15 years in prison after shooting someone during a robbery). He angrily lectures his sons Lyons (Russell Hornsby) and Cory (Jovan Adepo, pictured below with Washington) about self-discipline and standing on your own two feet, but we learn that Troy was only able to buy his home by using a government pay-out to his brother Gabe (Mykelti Williamson) who was seriously wounded in the Pacific war.

A very long early scene in Troy’s back yard, where he and his old friend Bono (Stephen Henderson, bottom picture) shoot the breeze over a bottle of gin after a hard day’s graft, sets the tone, and it’s a slightly wearisome one. Washington has great big-screen presence and I daresay he’s a fine stage actor too, but the self-consciously rhetorical pitch of Wilson’s dialogue is patently not designed for film. It’s the kind of writing which certain critics would try to tell you sounds like jazz music, but I’ll take Coltrane instead if you don’t mind. The scene is aiming to set Troy up as a master raconteur with a virtuoso grasp of the vernacular, but it’s more like being pushed against a wall – the fourth wall, possibly – and browbeaten into submission.

I won’t try to kid you that I’m a theatre critic, but you don’t have to be Kenneth Tynan to work out that language has an entirely different function, or range of functions, on the theatrical stage than it does in the movies. It does what lighting, location, cinematography and music do on screen, so placing Wilson’s unexpurgated text – this is a long haul at two hours 20 minutes – into a naturalistic filmic setting is like a conversation at cross purposes. Unfortunately the filmic setting is almost exclusively Troy’s ramshackle house, so where the theatre stage would be a gateway to a limitless imaginative universe, here we feel confined to one very specific small building in Pittsburgh. Troy’s fitful construction of the eponymous garden fence never fulfills the metaphorical weight Wilson intended to give it.

As director, Washington might have done better simply to film the stage play, because he has a terrific cast at his disposal. Adepo and Hornsby vividly convey their very different struggles with their difficult, domineering father, and Henderson’s Bono is a touching portrait of a faithful friend who’ll forgive Troy all his faults, but can’t bear to see him cheating on loyal, rock-solid Rose. As for Davis, her soulful and heartfelt performance looks well worth the Supporting Actress nod. Even if this is hardly the year’s most filmic of films.


Unfortunately the filmic setting is almost exclusively Troy’s ramshackle house

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more film

Dip your toes into these Homeric movies before Christopher Nolan’s 'The Odyssey' ties us to its mast
A Bellocchio classic is retooled as a stifllng rich-brats' revenge story
A potential camera in every hand: SMart celebrates smartphone directors
Hitchcockian black comedy from Luis Buñuel’s Mexican period
Olivia Wilde's snappy comedy on the perennial subject of reviving a failing marriage
Kiss kiss, bang bang in a moving Middle East documentary
David Vann's acclaimed novella transposed to the screen with mixed results
The most important 'how-to video' you are ever likely to see
Satyajit Ray's poignant, thoughtful drama, set in 1960s Calcutta
Superman's party girl cousin earns her stripes underwhelmingly
Convoluted drama takes on Fab Four delusions, brotherly trauma and ultraviolence
Sophy Romvari's atmospheric first feature looks back at a tortured family dynamic