Coming Clean, Trafalgar Studios review - Kevin Elyot play has lost the pathos if not the plot

1982 play needs sharpening in this shallow revival of a revival

share this article

Boys' night: Elliot Hadley and Lee Knight in 'Coming Clean'
Scott Rylander

Time and a transfer haven't been kind to this well-meaning but surface-thin revival of Coming Clean, the 1982 Kevin Elyot play that is surely more poignant than is ever apparent here. Two summers ago, much the same cast found a better-calibrated way into this portrait of gay life, love and loss in a first-floor Kentish Town flat. Back for an encore engagement, the four-person company seem to be playing to an invisible laugh track as if awaiting a TV sitcom spin-off of the same material. 

It's not just the facial tics and busy posturing that quickly grate. More damaging is the feeling that no one is really listening anymore to Elyot's plaintive take on the gathering lovelessness that besets a foursome bound together by a fraying thread. Tony (Lee Knight), the putative authorial surrogate, is a writer five years into what would appear to be a fairly tetchy relationship with Greg (Stanton Plummer-Cambridge), a New Yorker so disagreeable that one wonders how Tony ever made it a week in his company. (Plummer-Cambridge, the lone newcomer to the company, comes at the role with a palpable sense of disgust, as if nursing some damning secret to which the audience is never made privy.) Tom Lambert in 'Coming Clean'The fly in the ointment comes when Tony decides to hire a nubile young cleaner, Robert (Elyot brought in a comparable outsider in his later, and greater, My Night With Reg): the pursed-lipped, poshly spoken Tom Lambert (pictured above) gamely sheds his clothes as required by the dictates of a plot that exists to drive Tony and Greg apart, but his actions remain scarcely less cryptic than those of the scowl-heavy Greg. One is never quite sure whether Robert is simply an innocent adrift or, in fact, a minx-in-the-making who knows how to manoeuver the situation to sexual advantage. (Plummer-Cambridge and Knight, pictured below.) 

Stanton Plummer-Cambridge and Lee Knight in 'Coming Clean'Lending comic relief, and played to a non-existent balcony by Elliot Hadley, is Tony's camp, ciggie-smoking bestie, William, a Bradford wit who is never short of an aperçu or two and fields a joke about rimming a camel which must constitute some kind of first. The sort of visitor to one's home who soon takes it over, William threatens to capsize the delicate balance of the play. It therefore comes as something of a relief when Hadley returns later on to play a German pick-up of Tony's called – what else? – Jürgen in a Schubert-accompanied coda of sorts that brings the play to its melancholic finish. (The irony of Tony's last line – sehr, sehr gut – registers strongly.) 

The roundelay of missed connections and misplaced affections would go on to be a theme in the distinguished career of Elyot, who died in 2014 – the same year as the brilliant 20th-anniversary revival of Reg which proved conclusively that this writer's emotional dynamics can absolutely take their place alongside those of, say, Chekhov. As it is, Adam Spreadbury-Maher's production gets the occasional guffaw, and a soundscape encompassing both Mozart and Streisand lends an aural variety to complement the period detail of Amanda Mascarenhas's set, even if I didn't expect to find dimmer switches referenced in writing from this period. (Also surprising for a play from 1982: one character's past employment working in computers.) But the shifting eddies of feeling that ripple beneath the surface mostly go untapped: not so much coming clean as remaining unmoved.

The roundelay of missed connections and misplaced affections would go on to be a thematic in the distinguished career of Elyot

rating

2

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist