Louise Bourgeois, Kettle's Yard, Cambridge review - a slender but choice selection

Representative samples cry out for the domestic setting of Jim Ede's house

share this article

Louise Bourgeois, 'Couple I', 1996
Collection ARTIST ROOMS: National Galleries of Scotland and Tate

Pink walls, slightly dusky in the subdued light of a room shielded from the wintry sun, suggest the bodily concerns of this show, which through the touring collection Artists' Rooms, boldly reviews Louise Bourgeois’s career in a single, modestly sized, exhibition space at Kettle’s Yard. For a prolific artist associated with large-scale sculptures, the most obvious question is “How?”. But though four sculptures are featured, including one of the Cell series, this is a show that makes much of Bourgeois’s works on paper, including the 16-piece series, A L’Infini, where painting and drawing combine with print making.

The result is a show so summary that it is glib in its coherence, with Bourgeois’s familiar themes of identity and personal history, female sexuality and the physical constituents of the body, recurring with such constancy and frequency that she seems more than anything an artist with unnerving clarity of focus.

Even so, there is a sense of process, and of interests evolving. Printmaking – etching – was part of Bourgeois’s artistic toolkit before she took to sculpture, and the mechanical preoccupations of The Stretch take her into the natural territory of the sculptor. A strand of some apparently biological, ickily malleable material is threaded and manipulated through a series of rigid implements, the forces exerted by and through materials of contrasting properties eliciting a curiously visceral response in the viewer.

Louise Bourgeois, Spider I  1995  Bronze. Collection The Easton FoundationForces locked in tension animate Couple I (main picture), a sculpture made from textiles, and suspended from the ceiling like a sack, or a child’s swing, or a piece of meat. It is a work that gains power from its many contradictions: two bodies wrapped around each other so as to become one suggest the leaden mass of a corpse more than the pulsating bodies of lovers entwined. If from one angle the dangling legs suggest a position of extreme relaxation, like that of a baby carried in a sling, from another it seems more like the kind of stress position perfected in torture chambers.

A spider lurks in a corner, up near the ceiling, without doubt the most famous of Bourgeois’s contradictions in sculpture. She always said she had the utmost regard for spiders, and through them represented her mother, who she said was her best friend. But however arachnophile one might be, there is no question of the menacing nature of these sculptures, and it is a vision of feminity and of motherhood that is fierce, terrifying and omnipotent. Likewise Tits, from 1967, which cast in a single bronze piece recalls a bullet bent out of shape more than the yielding warmth of a bosom. It has, still, a brooding, aggressive eroticism, the smooth bronze with its burnished areolas compellingly tactile in a way that parallels some of the most memorable works in the permanent collection at Kettle’s Yard, brought together in the house-museum established by art collector Jim Ede in 1956. One longs to see it displayed in a room, near Gaudier-Breska’s Caritas, 1914, or the tactile little fetish sculpture Torpedo Fish (Toy), 1914.

Less amenable to display within Ede’s collection is the major work of the show, a series of etchings with pencil and watercolour from 2008-9, that conjure a womblike world in bloody, watery, skeins, the alpha and omega of existence, and the gamut of Bourgeois’s work. Seen alongside her sculptures, they present an aspect of the artist’s work that will be less familiar to many, but anchored in useful examples of her most celebrated works.

'Couple I' is a work that gains power from its many contradictions

rating

4

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more visual arts

Much-appreciated words of commendation from readers and the cultural community
Ritualistic performances and evocations of fertility goddesses
An inventive and uplifting programme of sculpture, live music, dance and spoken word
The mood is blue, but profundity is in short supply
A frieze of iPad pictures that sends you hurrying for the door