Milestone review - parable of an aging trucker

Ivan Ayr's second feature touches on dark themes but doesn't go deep enough

share this article

Anti-buddy road movie: Suvinder Vicky and Lakshvir Saran in Milestone

Watching Milestone, a new Netflix original directed by Ivan Ayr, I was reminded of the films of the great Iranian director Abbas Kiarostami. This story about an aging truck driver facing redundancy whilst grieving for his wife attempts the still mood and loneliness that Kiarostami favoured in his quiet epics. Milestone borrows a lot from existing filmmakers – no problem in itself – but does Ayr offer a unique style? Is Milestone just another Netflix original that isn’t really all that original?

Suvinder Vicky plays Ghalib, the withdrawn driver (the echoes to Ramin Bahrani’s films are undisguised) who begins the film by learning of the death of his wife. Hardship and misery pile on when Ghalib is forced to take on a young intern Pash (Lakshvir Saran) at the trucking company he works for. The kid is innocent but the weary Ghalib, plagued by back problems, senses that the springy upstart is being primed to take his job.

Under all this stress Ghalib seeks refuge in his truck. Ayr employs handed-down visual tactics in attempts to convey “mood” and “depth”, including long takes with a handheld camera (echoing Alan Clarke). But this on-the-fly minimalism doesn’t suit the grand tragedy of Ghalib’s situation. Doco-style filming betrays a script that promises Classical-epic potential. Ghalib’s story is one of profound suffering, of sublime tragedy updated for our temp-work age with beautiful prescience, and such a story deserves the same at the formal level. Instead Ayr pares back. Grey tones, minimal dialogue, stretched scenes, no music. These days this aesthetic is called raw, or urgent, or authentic, or even poetic. Bare-minimum naturalism can work if the story suits it. But for Ghalib, facing so much, it feels cheap.

Milestone’s look feels meager because Ghalib is such a complex character. He deserves complexity not simplicity. Ghalib gives off the impression that he has found himself in the wrong type of movie aesthetic, gazing blindly and unable to speak. Shreds of his personality do creep in, through the guilts and faults that compound as the film builds. He seems compassionate but also distant, so when we learn that he separated from his wife before she died, our empathy for him is questioned. How much was he responsible? We are forced to ask the same of his career: is Pash the issue, or is Ghalib unmotivated?

Milestone on theartsdeskMilestone is filled with these kinds of dark mysteries, and they are the film’s strengths. But when it comes to the formal articulation of high drama fitting for such mysteries, real poetry, it’s hard not to be disappointed. A wobbly unfocused handheld camera trailing Ghalib in an overlong walking shot is monotonous, feels shoddy and lacks rigour. The bold effort has not been seen through. So Milestone becomes art-house light, diet indie, sharp edges shorn: the kind of film that Netflix abounds in because the platform doesn’t want to frighten off potential subscribers with experimentation. Movies can’t be too original because then people won’t chill.

What about setting? There are various local Indian concerns that are raised but never really explored. The startlingly low median age in the country (this causes the tension between young Pash and aging Ghalib) and the binding family ties (Ghalib is forced to pay compensation to his deceased wife’s family) only get small glimpses. A deep dive into these issues, confronting Netflix’s mostly western viewers with new voices, might have offered a unique and courageous vision. Sadly Milestone plays it safe.

Ghalib gives off the impression that he has found himself in the wrong type of movie

rating

2

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more film

Dip your toes into these Homeric movies before Christopher Nolan’s 'The Odyssey' ties us to its mast
A Bellocchio classic is retooled as a stifllng rich-brats' revenge story
A potential camera in every hand: SMart celebrates smartphone directors
Hitchcockian black comedy from Luis Buñuel’s Mexican period
Olivia Wilde's snappy comedy on the perennial subject of reviving a failing marriage
Kiss kiss, bang bang in a moving Middle East documentary
David Vann's acclaimed novella transposed to the screen with mixed results
The most important 'how-to video' you are ever likely to see
Satyajit Ray's poignant, thoughtful drama, set in 1960s Calcutta
Superman's party girl cousin earns her stripes underwhelmingly
Convoluted drama takes on Fab Four delusions, brotherly trauma and ultraviolence
Sophy Romvari's atmospheric first feature looks back at a tortured family dynamic