Beyond Caring, National Theatre

New play about zero-hour contracts is powerfully authentic, but depressingly unentertaining

share this article

Table talk: Sean O’Callaghan and Janet Etuk in 'Beyond Caring'
Mark Douet

Recent plays with the verb “to care” in their titles – another is Michael Wynne’s Who Cares – suggests that the inequalities of life in Britain today can no longer be treated with our habitual indifference. This transfer of Alexander Zeldin’s devised drama from the Yard Theatre in London’s East End looks at the infamous zero-hours contracts, which have been much debated in recent months. As such, it is a rare representation of working-class life today.

Staged in the National Theatre’s small temporary space, which has been effectively transformed into the storage area of a meat factory, with ghastly neon lighting shining as much on the audience as on the actors, the play starts with the arrival of three agency workers. Called Becky, Susan and Grace, they are employed on zero-hours contracts to clean the floors, walls and machinery of the factory. As the evening progresses, each of them is individualized in highly committed performances by a cast which has researched and developed the characters.

The result feels true and
well researched

Becky (Victoria Moseley) is a mouthy Liverpudlian who is unable to get a Saturday off to see her young daughter; Susan (Kristin Hutchinson) is a 48-year-old who has very little to eat and who often tries to sleep in the factory (presumably because it’s cheaper than renting a place); Grace (Janet Etuk) has rheumatoid arthritis, but has lost her disability benefits and needs to work. These newcomers join the old hands: the taciturn fiftysomething Phil (Sean O’Callaghan), who is a permanent member of staff, and 27-year-old Ian (Luke Clarke, pictured below with Moseley), who supervises their work.

Ian is the jobsworth mini-Hitler who rules over these workers, showing them how to use an industrial cleaning machine or holding evaluations and team meetings that would be comic if the work was not so gruelling and relentless. In this atmosphere of compulsion and uncertain work, Phil tries to connect with Grace, while Becky resents the fact that he prefers to read a Dick Francis novel to talking with her. Ian circles around the women, a slightly sinister presence. Two sexual incidents – one a lonley wank; the other a sad coupling – are moments of rawness in a universe of dull aches.

Zeldin has devised and directed the show by fully collaborating with his cast, and the result feels true and well researched. At first, however, it is as boring to watch people clean as it is to watch the proverbial paint dry, and it takes a while for this 90-minute piece to warm up. Frankly, there is no plot to speak of, and only rare incidents and rare moments of revealing dialogue. Although the lighting is suitably oppressive and the machinery stinks of meat, the play never really finds a metaphor for work that is stronger than the dirt that the characters have to clean up.

Yes, it’s a shit world full of shit jobs. For while much of Beyond Caring has the quiet power of suffering humanity, only those with very little imagination will be shocked by the dreadful working conditions illustrated here. Since the play offers no real solutions to the situation it so strongly represents it ends on a note of depressing desperation. While Zeldin and his cast successfully create a relentless image of alienation, it is not enough. As one bearded radical once almost said: “Theatre people have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.”

The play never really finds a metaphor for work that is stronger than the dirt that the characters have to clean up

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist