An Ideal Husband, Vaudeville Theatre review - unsettled evening leaves blood on Wilde's drawing-room furniture

A strong cast can't quite pull off the author's most political play

share this article

Fathers and sons: The Earl of Caversham (Edward Fox) and Lord Goring (Freddie Fox)
Marc Brenner

Across London last night politicians waited anxiously to hear their fates, and things were no different at the Vaudeville Theatre, where the ongoing Oscar Wilde season took a topical turn with An Ideal Husband.

Colliding drawing-room comedy and Victorian melodrama, the play is at worst uneven, but at best it has a violence that sets the bone china rattling. The stakes of this political satire are real and high, only further raised by the knowledge that Wilde’s own society idyll was about to be shattered. Before the play’s original run had ended he was arrested, trading rubbers of bridge and bon mots for Reading Gaol.

Freddie Fox’s lighter-than-air Lord Goring holds the play’s fragile comedy in the palm of his hand

You don’t cast Frances Barber as agent provocateur Mrs Cheveley (pictured below right) if you plan to soften the play’s harder edges, but in loosing this particular theatrical tiger into his drawing room director Jonathan Church risks upsetting more than the teacups.

Caged in the tight epigrams and still-tighter corsetry of Victorian comedy, Barber’s dramatic ferocity breaks out in unexpected directions. Striding around Simon Higlett’s kitschy sets (we open with Barbie’s gold-and-mirrors Versailles Dream House, with Lord Goring’s flat offering a brief cerise interlude in Barbie’s Opium Den) as though in army boots, Barber’s tread is equally heavy through the text.

But her rather strenuous weight is off-set by Freddie Fox’s lighter-than-air Lord Goring, who holds the play’s fragile comedy in the palm of his elegant hand throughout. The interplay between Goring and his father the Earl of Caversham is deliciously spiced by the real-life father-son pairing of Freddie and Edward Fox. The latter’s drawling delivery may be getting progressively more eccentric, but there’s a delicious energy between the duo – a sense of comfort, of ease among Wilde’s starched vowels and collars – that anchors an otherwise rather unsettled production that can’t decide if it wants to do affirmation-and-epigrams or something more serious.

Susan Hampshire’s Lady Markby, glinting with quality, sits awkwardly alongside Faith Omole’s costume jewel of a Mabel Chiltern, and for every moment of exquisitely pointed satirical probing there are smothering quarter-hours of glossy nullity.

The contemporary parallels of Wilde’s meticulous dissection of political hypocrisy, expediency and ambition, in which rising star politician Sir Robert Chiltern (a slightly soft-focus Nathanial Parker, pictured below, with Barber) finds himself blackmailed and brought to the brink of disgrace, make themselves. There was a particularly bitter laugh at Lady Markby’s declaration that, “our Society is terribly over-populated. Really, someone should arrange a proper scheme of assisted emigration.”But the still-sharp points of these barbs feel blunted by so much nostalgic affectation, reduced to joke-shop copies by so much camp. Where Fox, conjurer-like, produces some truth from the silk-lined pockets of the foppish Goring, Church can’t quite quite pull off the same trick. His satirical top-hat is empty, leaving the plot’s elaborate set-up making dramatic promises it just can’t keep. It may have been election week in London, but this empty bluster and political posturing feels like topicality taken a step too far.

@AlexaCoghlan

Jonathan Church's production can’t decide if it wants to do affirmation-and-epigrams or something more serious

rating

3

explore topics

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist