The Old Ladies, Finborough Theatre review - sound, but not quite creepy enough

Rodney Ackland's 1935 play about loneliness deserves a higher-tech treatment

share this article

Gaslit: Catherine Cusack, far right, as May, with Julia Watson as Lucy, Abigail Thaw as Agatha
Carla Joy Evans

In its heyday, Rodney Ackland’s 1935 play The Old Ladies, adapted from a 1924 novel by Hugh Walpole, was a favourite with doyennes of the theatre world including Edith Evans, Flora Robson and Miriam Karlin. But it has languished unstaged in London for more than 30 years.

The Finborough is to be congratulated for giving it another go-round as a stage play, though it's a piece that deserves to be filmed. It also makes a spooky radio play, as you can hear in the BBC Radio adaptation of the novel with Edith Evans as Agatha (available online). In the small confines of the Finborough it builds up a decent degree of tension, but not as much, I suspect, as a skilfully edited TV version deploying higher-tech sound design and special effects might.

The piece is a three-hander, about a trio of elderly women living alone in the same building in Polchester, a fictitious cathedral city Ackland set several works in. The women can see the cathedral from their windows and hear its solemn tolling bells. Their bedsits have to be shoehorned into the teeny stage, Lucy Amorest (Julia Watson) getting the lion’s share, with the room of May Beringer (Catherine Cusack) represented by her single bed, and that of Agatha Payne (Abigail Thaw) by a rocking chair and a doll.

Over 90 minutes we watch as the natural little fissures in the women’s relationships turn into wide cracks through which antagonistic outbursts explode. Lucy seems the most sensible, a widow with an errant son she expects to arrive imminently; she attends church and has kindly Christian urges. May is of great concern to her, a wizened new lodger from St Leonard’s, who’s of a nervous disposition and can talk of little except her late dog Pip and her best friend Jane, who gave Pip to her, along with a lump of amber that has become May’s prize possession.

Image
Julia Watson as Lucy, Abigail Thaw as Agatha, Catherine Cusack as May  in The Old Ladies

Stirring their pots is Agatha, a striking widow in comparatively exotic clothing who predicts the future with her playing cards. She takes an instant dislike to newcomer May, and a just as sudden desire to take the lump of amber off her hands. As it seems to be the foundation stone of May’s mental wellbeing, unsurprisingly she rejects Agatha’s offer point blank. Lucy tries to run interference between them, convinced May has a weak heart that too much of a shock will destroy.

Each woman is unhappy in her own way in this pre-welfare state era with no safety nets. Lucy has run out of money and has only a cousin and her elusive son Brand to turn to, though she has no idea where Brand is or whether he receives her weekly letters. May is openly fearful of her encroaching poverty and needs to “find a position” that doesn’t tax her too much. And Agatha hates being surrounded by people with no “gumption” who don’t love beauty. She longs for the days when she experienced passion; now she loves sweet sticky things, like nougat, and revels in colour, finding May insipid (Cusack is carefully costumed in a pale grey). Part of the amber’s appeal for Agatha is the array of colours it reflects in the light. And, of course, its value. She too needs money, if only to buy the amber off May. But she also covets the money Lucy has been promised by her ageing cousin and hopes to be loaned a share of it.

Predictably, this slow-burning but combustible mix ignites. The tension as we feel the shadows around the women deepening, and odd knockings on the walls gathering pace, is underpinned by the eerie sound of Agatha’s low muttering and groaning, asleep in her rocking chair, a sound May is acutely aware of. She begins to dread Agatha’s sudden appearances in her room, unannounced, renewing her demands to see, then to be given, the amber.

Image
Abigail Thaw as Agatha, Catherine Cusack as May in The Old Ladies

Abigail Thaw delivers an Agatha in the same mode as Rebecca’s Mrs Danvers, somehow alien, sinister and extremely caustic — she has fun mocking May’s way of talking and her soppy “bye-bye”s. Her distaste for May’s wimpish sentimentality and, as she sees it, Lucy’s lack of imagination is actually rather appealing — as are her mad hats — but she’s a sinister presence, her dark eyes staring out at us, haunting and haunted. Lucy makes the suggestion, its prejudice shocking now, that Agatha queerness may be because she's, gasp, a Roman Catholic…

Cusack is suitably highly strung and vulnerable, easy prey for Agatha’s gaslighting, and Watson is a perfect projection of middle-class “niceness”, slightly stolid but decent and gregarious. She spends money she can’t afford on a surprise for the other two women, a gesture of both her generosity of spirit and her profligacy. My only quibble with the casting is that all of the actors seem less elderly than written.

The three negotiate the squashed playing area as best they can, but its intimacy doesn’t allow for shocks. Agatha is always in sight, slowly rocking in her chair as if in a trance, but her sudden appearances in May’s room are a surprise only to May. You long for Agatha to suddenly manifest there, a technique television could pull off, and genuinely scare you too. Under Brigid Larmour’s direction, Lucy is presented as eminently sane throughout, and not a victim of her fantasies about her son, the prop in her loneliness. The play ends on a note of high anxiety, its plot lines fruitfully unresolved, but with its dramatic potential underachieved.

Agatha's sudden appearances in May's room are a surprise only to May

rating

3

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist