Yuletide Scenes: Giotto's Nativity

The birth of Christ depicted for the first time as a human drama

Some time in the late 1280s, the artist Cimabue was wandering in the Tuscan countryside when he chanced upon a boy shepherd. According to Vasari, whose Lives of the Artists is the source for most such stories, the boy was “portraying a sheep from nature on a flat and polished slab, with the stone slightly pointed, without having learnt any method of doing this from others, but only from nature.” The young untrained artist was Giotto, who would be taken to Florence as Cimabue's apprentice and soon outstrip his master.

Posterity has been deprived of the sheep scratched in stone. But Giotto would paint some more sheep in his version of the Nativity. The Scrovegni Chapel in Padua was consecrated in 1305 when the artist was not yet 30. There is no finer fresco cycle by Giotto, or by pretty much anyone else anywhere, although in fact the chapel houses two, showing the lives of the Virgin and of Christ, with a Last Judgement filling the entrance wall.

Giotto placed the Nativity in a shed rather than the traditional Byzantine locale of a cave. It’s a distinction that excites art historians but for everyone else what takes the breath away is the humanity, the overpowering sense of real life and the real world injected for the first time into religious iconography. A mother never took possession of her newborn with greater tenderness than Mary of her swaddled child. Her attendant handles the impassive boy with loving care. In the foreground a beady ox and a ravenous ass dig their snouts into the manger while a sleeping Joseph crouches on the ground next to an adorable little flock of half a dozen sheep. Over the roof angels crowd the sky in mobile attitudes of devotion, the central one looking down at an angle that is intensely Giottesque, while to the side two robed shepherds in cross-gartered boots turn away from the viewer to gaze in wonder. Italian painting had never seen such an eloquent back before: on a flat plane Giotto had the power to make his figures move.  

“He deserves to be called the pupil of nature and no other,” concluded Vasari, who never made it to Padua. Is it too fanciful to imagine that one of those shepherds is, if not a likeness, then a projection of Giotto himself?

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
A mother never took possession of her newborn with greater tenderness

rating

0

share this article

the future of arts journalism

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

DFP tag: MPU

more visual arts

Much-appreciated words of commendation from readers and the cultural community
Fashion photographer, artist or war reporter; will the real Lee Miller please step forward?
Locally rooted festival brings home many but not all global concerns
Remembering an artist with a gift for the transcendent
Pictures that are an affirmation of belonging
Small scale intensity meets large scale melodrama