Anahera, Finborough Theatre review - blistering family drama from New Zealand

A runaway child precipitates a cascade of questions with unintended consequences

share this article

Caroline Faber and Acushla-Tara Kupe
© Ali Wright

With power comes responsibility. One without the other is sickening -- and both iterations are on show in Emma Kinane's searing new play about a child runaway in New Zealand. 

Social worker Anahera (played by Acushla-Tara Kupe, pictured above right) is at the house Liz and Peter (played by Caroline Faber pictured above left and Rupert Wickman), the parents of seven year-old Imogen and eleven year-old run-away Harry, while social services attempt to find him. In Emily Bestow’s canny design it's a clean, formal house. A square marble table occupies a washed rug. An orchid sits sculptural and sepulchral on its top. Small white cubes encase chandelier lights. It's anodyne, characterless, cold.

At the play's opening, everyone seems powerless. Anahera reads from her case notes, Liz fiddles with her rings and phone, Peter paces, bracing himself against his arms. None of them seem able to control the situation, all three are waiting. But the way the situation has spiralled out of control is someone's responsibility and the play is dedicated not to the cheap thrill of whether Harry comes back home, but rather to the knotty, noxious question of what caused him to run away in the first place.

Acushla-Tara Kupeas Anahera © Ali WrightIn the course of this part of the play - a three-hander - weaknesses are ruthlessly exploited. It is part of Anahera's job to be both an emotional support and a witness. As a junior social worker she can probe both deftly and ineptly: she is wise beyond her years and sometimes touchingly naive. Kupe's flatly patient eyes at the first mention of her Maori heritage belie nothing, but refrain too from passing judgment. Peter's outbursts of rage and vicious examination of the areas of life in which she is least secure displays a heavy-handedness that may well be born of suppressed guilt. Liz's morbid attention to her inbox and the dust the house has accrued is only the brittlest line from betraying her working-class background and bursting into fully-fledged sociopathy.

The other part of the action takes place decades later. Imogen (played by Jessica O’Toole) is pregnant, Harry (played by Paul Waggott) is a father, and Liz has had a stroke. For the sake of her child (or, it transpires, maybe herself) Imogen sets up a booze-fuelled family reconciliation meeting, jokingly named Apocalypse. It seems - quite rightly - that it's impossible to re-create a world without "echoes". To exorcise the past means to revisit it, give it new life - a new type of old trauma. Her approach bears disconcerting similarities with the kind of perfectionist mores so debilitatingly espoused by her mother, Liz. On the other hand, maybe it's Harry who has taken his mother's line. Both drink heavily, he's suggested to be physically a bit of a brute, and the soft tenderness of his children frightens him. Anahera's assertion that trauma carries down family lines is demonstrated as true, but also sometimes complex, inscrutable. Though responsibility must be attributed, those who are both victim and tormentor complicate matters.

Some parts of the play stretch credulity. Quite a number of Harry's lines are forcibly written, overly-expositional. Some of the jumps between time periods are hard to explain or happen too fast for the emotions from each scene to settle. And where Imogen is throughout the time that Harry is a young runaway remains a puzzle (it might be a disturbing detail, but nothing is made of it meaning it seems an omission). Small criticisms aside, this is a gruelling, brilliantly acted, engrossing play. See it intimately before it gets a bigger stage.

This is a gruelling, brilliantly acted, engrossing play

rating

4

share this article

Support the future of arts journalism

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thanks so much for choosing genuinely independent arts journalism theartsdesk’s mission has never been more important – in an age of relentless algorithmic recommendation, sponsored content and unreliable AI, the expertise and discernment of individual critics deeply embedded in their specialist areas is absolutely vital.

If you want more of that in your life, why not subscribe now?

If you do this before the 31st August, you’ll be able to keep at this “founders rate” for life: your subs will never increase! You can choose to subscribe annually for just £40 simply click here
or monthly for £5 per month simply click here.

Not ready to subscribe?

If you want to support with a little extra or aren’t ready to subscribe just yet, there’s also the option to give direct to our crowdfunder to support our imminent redesign and exciting expansion with new features and collaborations Simply contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d.

However you choose to be involved, you can proudly say that you are picking the right side in the battle for truth and humanity in the modern information landscape. And we will be very glad to have you on board!

more theatre

Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs
New play about domestic abuse adopts a radical form that works - up to a point
Adrian Lester’s spiky, swaggering hero is the apex predator in this linguistic ecosystem
American playwright Rajiv Joseph’s account of Serbian political assassins really rocks
Michael Longhurst's intelligent directing wrings fresh laughs from a familiar setup
Small-scale film becomes major emotional experience as a stage musical
Martin Crimp’s sparkling latest revisits Molière and gives the play a gender twist